Talk:Main Page
From SomefinkWiki
The Main Page
Put any suggestions for improvements here, you sorry sots. Elijahmeeks 21:08, 5 July 2006 (PDT)
- There are three "dosomefink" pages. If someone could combine them, it would be nice.
- Thanks to Egbert, there are numerous articles that need categorizing. (You're Welcome)
- Several people need "this is not a/an" pics.
--Stoat 16:03, 11 July 2006 (PDT)
Does "Wikipocalypse" work alright? It sounds a bit unwieldy to me. Any other ideas?
Apocalypki?
- Sounds like a Polish food. Egbert
BTW, we definitely need entries on:
Hmmmm... hmmmm... that's all I can think of right now
Be careful when putting links to the real big wiki. I almost posted dosomefink style edits to the whole world. Egbert 11:06, 12 July 2006 (PDT)
Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon --Stoat 22:06, 17 July 2006 (PDT)
Men, I have the distinct feeling not many people are reading this wiki and profiting from its wisdom. We need to do somefink about it, and that means making the wiki more attractive for readers. We need more sex. Not only many, many pictures of good-looking naked young women, but references to sex in every or almost every article. Come on, there's not much in the world of man that can't be easily linked to sex. Zarquon
Much better now but there are still pages without babes or references to sex. Zarquon 16:26, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
Programmed Bughunt currently sucks, for lack of pages. Shouldn't be a done somefink.--Stoat 17:58, 6 August 2006 (PDT)
Sure. Go ahead. Zarquon 18:10, 6 August 2006 (PDT)
Scandalous! http://dosomefink.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Lonelypages Zarquon
Britney files for divorce. I would seriously consider raising the Threat Level to Apricot.
- Don't think we haven't already done that, vile anonymous traitor to the der VViki! Elijahmeeks 14:37, 9 November 2006 (PST)
nudity and sexual content on the wiki and do somefink
There are a lot of funny and witty things on the wiki and do somefink, as well as a lot of sound ideas. I do, however, think that the amount of internet sleaze images needs to be reduced. It cheapens an otherwise great website. And I can't tell younger people I know to check out cool stuff on here or contribute, because I don't want to play a part in supporting pornographic images. Please be more respectful and attempt to refrain from throwing such nasty images on here--the website is original, amusing, and witty enough to attract an audience without that. I don't want to have to enjoy reading funny or thoughtful things, and then be blindsighted by trash.
- I blame Zarqon. Egbert
I would condone the removal of all such images. I they degrade from the usually funny text of the articles and serve only to perpetuate Zarquon's disgusting lifestyle.--Stoat 15:50, 26 November 2006 (PST)
Can we have an index that point us directly to all those porn pictures, please? I mean, I don't want to actually have to read the articles. It isn't Playboy.--Argie 20:51, 26 November 2006 (PST)
Notice -- Keep the girlie pictures PG-13 at the most. No nips, bush & other naughty bits. And no cock in any shape or form. Capiche? I don't want to not be able to check in on the Wiki from work. --Gyrene
- Yeah, that's a good point. Egbert
Pictures of girls under 13, you pervert? --Argie 22:19, 26 November 2006 (PST)
I've vectorized Sam Fox, so now it's only Egbert's foot & celebrity fetish pics, and of cause argie's kiddie porn collection
http://dosomefink.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Newimages
Zarquon
- Sigh, forgot about Sam. Egbert 13:15, 27 November 2006 (PST)
WHAT?! There is porn on zee wiki! I am disgusted. This will be cleaned and the purpletraitors will be punished! Elijahmeeks 18:05, 27 November 2006 (PST)
The ASCII porn I could give a shit about, but I'm considering removing the pics from whatever articles they may be lurking in. I'm in a wiki-editting mood, but I don't want to have to worry about whether or not I'll get "caught looking at porn" while doing so.--Stoat 18:59, 29 December 2006 (PST)
- There shouldn't be much out there lurking anymore. I think everything elses is safe for work. Egbert
- I'm not talking work friendly, though I doubt most of the pages are even that. I'm talking about "mom friendly."--Stoat 11:26, 30 December 2006 (PST)
Spam site
When I access the wiki I see it constantly connecting to m1.2mdn.net--is there any reason for this? Elijahmeeks 16:08, 30 June 2007 (PDT)
